Ike Davis, Pedro Alvarez, and Why 2013 Does Not Equal 2014

It’s March 31, 2014 and the Pirates Opening Day first-baseman is a man who hit .205 with a .660 OPS in 2013.


Well, the good news is that it is always a bad idea to base expectations for a player’s future performance solely upon what he did in the previous season. For instance,  if the Pirates had made a judgment based entirely on the 2011 season, their third-baseman would now be somebody other than Pedro Alvarez, who, you may remember, hit 36 home runs in the most recently concluded season. (And, lest ye forget, the now-legendary Marlon Byrd hit .210 with a .488 OPS in 2012.)

In 2011, Alvarez’s batting line was .191/.272/.289 — .561 OPS. That’s bad. That’s real bad. In fact, it is far worse than the .205/.326/.334 — .660 OPS that was posted in 2013 by New York Met first-baseman Ike Davis.

There are Pirate fans who are disturbed by the reports that their team has interest in trading for Davis and putting him in a platoon with Gaby Sanchez at first-base. Those fans are focused primarily on Davis’ dreadful 2013 batting line. That’s a mistake.

Ike Davis, in 2014, is very likely to do just what Pedro Alvarez did in 2012. Bounce back. In a Big Way!

Davis and Alvarez were both selected in the first round of the 2008 draft, at age 21, and both made their major league debut in 2010.

In his rookie season of 2010, Davis hit 19 home runs in 601 plate appearances and had a .791 OPS. Alvarez, in his rookie season – that same year – hit 16 home runs in 386 plate appearances and had a .787 OPS.

The following season, Alvarez had a complete power outage, hitting only 4 home runs in 262 plate appearances. But there were indications that he would bounce back. His 2011 walk and strikeout rates were almost identical to his 2010 numbers and his BABIP fell 70 points in 2011.

Alvarez’s 2011 power loss was the big problem, but the BB and K rates suggested it would return. And that, along with a normalized BABIP, would bring his batting average and on-base percentage back to an acceptable level.

Alvarez was likely to bounce back in 2012 (he hit .244/.317/.467 — .784 OPS that year) and the same indications are there for Davis in 2014.

Davis’ 2013 problems – like Alvarez’s 2011 problems – look to have been a power loss and a below average BABIP. And, remember, Davis’ troubled 2013 was not nearly as disturbed as Alvarez’s dreadful 2011. Davis had a .660 OPS. Alvarez’s was .561.

Lost in the rubble of Davis’ 2013 is the sabermetrically scintillating fact that his walk rate spiked to an astounding 15.1 % and his K rate only rose slightly to 26.8%. That is a strong indication that Davis’ power is going to come back – and it doesn’t have as far too travel as Alvarez’s did after the 2011 season. Davis homered once every 42 plate appearances last season. In 2011, Alvarez homered once every 66 plate appearances.

Another factor in Davis favor – as a Pirate – would be that Gaby Sanchez will take care of the lefties for him. The Pirates need Davis to hit right-handers and he has done that at an .827 OPS clip for his career. That’s not bad – especially when one considers that Pedro Alvarez’s career OPS against right-handers is .798.

As I wrote above, Davis and Alvarez were both selected in the first round of the 2008 draft, at the age of 21, and both made their MLB debut in 2010. Here is a comparison of some of their key career numbers:

Davis  /  Alvarez

PA:      1711  /  1848

BA:      .242  /  .235

OBP:   .334  /  .306

SLG:    .434  /  .443

OPS:    .768  /  .749

wOBA:  .334  /  .324

PA/HR:  25.5  /  21.5

BB%:    12.1%  /  9.0%

K%:        24%  /  30.6%

BABIP:  .287  /  .299

A reasonable expectation (Projection) for Davis’ 2014 batting line is .228/.337/.452 — .789 OPS, with 20 HR in 390 plate appearances. Against RHP, I project a batting line of .235/.364/.471 — .835 OPS. That kind of production is worth giving up Jeff Locke, Jason Grilli, Tony Watson, Mark Melancon, or Andrew Lambo – or some combination of those players.  And maybe even Nick Kingham!

If the Pirates don’t make the mistake of projecting Ike Davis’ future performance based solely upon what he did last season, they could end up with Pedro Alvarez at 3B and a Pedro Alvarez clone at 1B – for the next three years.


Mets-Merized Blog article on Ike Davis     Rising Apple: The Davis Dilemma

139 thoughts on “Ike Davis, Pedro Alvarez, and Why 2013 Does Not Equal 2014

  1. hold on – you made the opposite argument regarding a potential Loney deal because he was just one year removed from a .630 OPS season… granted the money/deals are different, but you seem to want to have it both ways.

    personally, i think Davis is a dud – an utterly forgettable AAA+ 1B who – unlike Loney – doesn’t make enough contact. let’s not project “bounce back” seasons for guys just because they’re cheap & available… after all, we’re talking about a subpar Mets team here, and they don’t want this guy?!?!?

    • Loney signed for 3 years and $21 million. Davis is arbitration eligible and is projected to earn $3.5 million. He would only require a one year commitment.

      I stated in the post my reasons for expecting a bounce back season for Davis.

  2. Ike Davis has been too uneven of a player to speak of a bounce back with a high degree of certainty. His BABIP wasn’t even all that low last year. It actually rose pretty significantly from the prior year. I know you look at his BB rates and think that will help him stabilize. I see how much his BB rates spiked and I believe that will be unsustainable. I’m not saying he won’t bounce back. Given what the Pirates have at the 1B position he is worth the gamble. But I wouldn’t even give the slightest consideration of trading Nick Kingham for him. I think Nick Kingham is going to be very good. I actually think Kingham is going to be better than Taillon. The other issue with Davis is that his defense is below average and he isn’t even all that cheap.

  3. Do you think that Neal Huntington believes that the Mets have no one else to trade Ike Davis to and are trying to get him for a reliever other than Wilson or Watson?

    Is Huntington playing hard ball?

    • I don’t know, but the Brewers were reported to have strong interest in Davis. The Mets were said to have asked for starting pitcher Tyler Thornburg.

  4. I think it is smart baseball to try to hold onto Nick Kingham. Because down the road, the Pirates may need a trading chip.

    I would look at trading a reliever for Ike Davis or Jeff Locke. I would even consider trading Tony Watson and signing Oliver Perez to replace him.

  5. Pingback: Alisha Gantt

  6. Pingback: Carrol Party

  7. Pingback: Hay Day Cheats

  8. Pingback: Grand Theft Auto: Vice City cheats

  9. Pingback: Trackback

  10. Pingback: Trackback

  11. Pingback: Trackback

  12. Pingback: Trackback

  13. Pingback: Trackback

  14. Pingback: Trackback

  15. Pingback: Trackback

  16. Pingback: Trackback

  17. Pingback: Trackback

  18. Pingback: Trackback

  19. Pingback: Trackback

  20. Pingback: Trackback

  21. Pingback: Trackback

  22. Pingback: quality backlinks list

  23. Pingback: Quick Auto Title Loans Los Angeles

  24. Pingback: Need legal advice?

  25. Pingback: Trackback

  26. Pingback: Trackback

  27. Pingback: sizegenetics buy

  28. Pingback: garcinia cambogia max buy

  29. Pingback: best testosterone supplements

  30. Pingback: www.youTube.com/watch?v=-ypGoBqbtg0

  31. Pingback: read this post here Scottsdale DUI lawyers

  32. Pingback: lening simulatie

  33. Pingback: cara memutihkan kulit secara alami

  34. Pingback: Search Engine Optimization Cyprus

  35. Pingback: paintless dent removal training

  36. Pingback: Embroidered Chino Caps North Atlanta

  37. Pingback: paintless dent removal training

  38. Pingback: paintless dent repair training

  39. Pingback: Water Woods EC

  40. Pingback: paintless dent removal training

  41. Pingback: beira anticonscience asterales

  42. Pingback: paintless dent removal training course

  43. Pingback: pdr tools

  44. Pingback: membership club

  45. Pingback: paintless dent removal training

  46. Pingback: Love Letters For Her

  47. Pingback: ถ่ายรูป

  48. Pingback: continued

  49. Pingback: Love Letters For Him

  50. Pingback: หางานช่างภาพอิสระ

  51. Pingback: http://vaporscigarette.com/

  52. Pingback: trilive tampines

  53. Pingback: click here

  54. Pingback: http://newpropertyout.blogspot.com

  55. Pingback: keep his love

  56. Pingback: http://www.krispykremecoupons.blogspot.com

  57. Pingback: rachael ray on garcinia cambogia

  58. Pingback: Trackback

  59. Pingback: ogród

  60. Pingback: short term bridge loans

  61. Pingback: for more info

  62. Pingback: http://okcouponcodes.us/hobby-lobby-coupons/

  63. Pingback: ถ่ายรูปรับปริญญา

  64. Pingback: garcinia cambogia extract gnc stores

  65. Pingback: url man

  66. Pingback: Home

  67. Pingback: muscle rev x

  68. Pingback: dr oz pure garcinia cambogia episode

  69. Pingback: pure garcinia cambogia gnc reviews

  70. Pingback: last minute accommodation

  71. Pingback: ecommerce web site design

  72. Pingback: gero onsen ryokan

  73. Pingback: interesante articulo

  74. Pingback: Soccer IQ

  75. Pingback: anonymous

  76. Pingback: This orthodontist will make you look beautiful.

  77. Pingback: hca garcinia cambogia

  78. Pingback: รับปริญญา

  79. Pingback: pozycjonowanie stron

  80. Pingback: rowery

  81. Pingback: Serviced Apartments in Gurgaon

  82. Pingback: supplements to burn fat

  83. Pingback: Brampton emergency furnace repair

  84. Pingback: acai berry weight loss

  85. Pingback: Trackback

  86. Pingback: e cig free trial

  87. Pingback: รับปริญญา จุฬา 2557

  88. Pingback: credit check free

  89. Pingback: credit monitoring services

  90. Pingback: 3 credit reports

  91. Pingback: dr oz new diet

  92. Pingback: which garcinia cambogia does dr oz recommend

  93. Pingback: where to buy garcinia cambogia extract

  94. Pingback: 3 bureau credit reports

  95. Pingback: LED Signs

  96. Pingback: entry systems installation london

  97. Pingback: Construction Signs

  98. Pingback: Best Minneapolis SEO Consultant

  99. Pingback: informacion

  100. Pingback: access control systems installation london

  101. Pingback: SEO Austin TX

  102. Pingback: wireless intruder alarms installation london

  103. Pingback: learn this here now

  104. Pingback: burglar alarm installation

  105. Pingback: advice

  106. Pingback: depannage plomberie paris

  107. Pingback: zdrowa dieta

  108. Pingback: diet garcinia cambogia

  109. Pingback: best way to get rid of cellulite

  110. Pingback: deer antler velvet spray

  111. Pingback: dentrepairhelp.com

  112. Pingback: seo-superior.com

  113. Pingback: pixelitas.com

  114. Pingback: junk removal woodstock ga

  115. Pingback: general contractors marietta ga

  116. Pingback: how to stop premature ejaculation

  117. Pingback: Search Engine Optimization Dallas

  118. Pingback: home improvement atlanta

  119. Pingback: http://youtu.be/xNy8zAPSck8

  120. Pingback: informacion veraz

  121. Pingback: Trackback

  122. Pingback: Trackback

  123. Pingback: Trackback

  124. Pingback: potencja opinie

  125. Pingback: Trackback

  126. Pingback: title loans

  127. Pingback: Trackback

  128. Pingback: Trackback

  129. Pingback: Info

  130. Pingback: {buy ketoconazole shampoo no prescription|ketoconazole cream 2 skin conditions|ketoconazole loperamide|ketoconazole face wash|nizoral on face|is nizoral coming back|ketoconazole pills dogs}

  131. Pingback: {is bactrim used for herpes|does bactrim cover gram negative bacilli|bactrim and aldactone|urinary tract infection treatment bactrim|bactrim ds and insulin|bactrim ds walmart|septra bactrim side effects}

  132. Pingback: Tech

  133. Pingback: {amoxil vomiting|active ingredients in amoxil|safety of amoxil in pregnancy|componentes do amoxil|amoxil guide|indication of amoxil|amoxil 500mg uti}

  134. Pingback: Finance

  135. Pingback: Liberty

  136. Pingback: Trading

Leave a Reply